Forum Discussion
JimL
16 years agoContributor
Ole,
Yes, I did try using "Binary Security Token" (rather than "X509 Certificate"), and when I did that, the appliance was able to verify the signature.
I had already kind of guessed that that would have worked before my test , but the reason I was trying the "X509 Certificate" in the dropdown was that I was trying to get a signature where the cert was embedded in the in the signature. That was originally when I found what I mentioned in the first message in this thread, i.e., I had actually been expecting something like:
MIIDMDCCApmgA....
As I also said earlier in the thread, I'm still learning about all of this, so I don't know what the reasons (pros or cons) would be for:
MIIDMDCCApmgA....
vs. something like:
MIIDMDCCApmgAwIB....
both which work with the appliance, i.e., I don't know why one would be used vs. the other, but I was just trying to point out what did, and didn't work.
Jim
Yes, I did try using "Binary Security Token" (rather than "X509 Certificate"), and when I did that, the appliance was able to verify the signature.
I had already kind of guessed that that would have worked before my test , but the reason I was trying the "X509 Certificate" in the dropdown was that I was trying to get a signature where the cert was embedded in the
As I also said earlier in the thread, I'm still learning about all of this, so I don't know what the reasons (pros or cons) would be for:
vs. something like:
MIIDMDCCApmgAwIB....
both which work with the appliance, i.e., I don't know why one would be used vs. the other, but I was just trying to point out what did, and didn't work.
Jim
Related Content
Recent Discussions
- 5 days agoemoya