MTOM and Content-ID
Hi, I'm having some issues after moving from soapUi 2.5.1 and 3.6.1 (big jump I know) with a MTOM web service.
In 2.5.1, elements used in the SOAP are created with the cid reference and a number, for example,
<blob1 xm:contentType="audio/mp3">cid:1219579121464</blob1>
when you add an attachment, and choose the part from the dropdown list, the ContentID column stays blank. When I check the raw MTOM message that is sent to my service, the Content-ID header (in the part with my attachment) has it's value equal to the cid reference. Which I understand is exactly what the MTOM spec says. And that works *great*!
For soapui 3.6.1, again, I go through the same process, and a cid:reference is generated in the SOAP. But after I add the attachement, the ContentID becomes the filename of the attachment, and this is what the Content-ID header has in the raw MTOM message. Therefore, the "default" numeric cid reference needs to be manually changed in the SOAP to match the filename. OK, not a big deal, but in terms of usability, it's an extra, error-prone step that everyone must do before calling their service.
Any thoughts? It would be great to change it back to the way it worked in 2.5.1
In 2.5.1, elements used in the SOAP are created with the cid reference and a number, for example,
<blob1 xm:contentType="audio/mp3">cid:1219579121464</blob1>
when you add an attachment, and choose the part from the dropdown list, the ContentID column stays blank. When I check the raw MTOM message that is sent to my service, the Content-ID header (in the part with my attachment) has it's value equal to the cid reference. Which I understand is exactly what the MTOM spec says. And that works *great*!
For soapui 3.6.1, again, I go through the same process, and a cid:reference is generated in the SOAP. But after I add the attachement, the ContentID becomes the filename of the attachment, and this is what the Content-ID header has in the raw MTOM message. Therefore, the "default" numeric cid reference needs to be manually changed in the SOAP to match the filename. OK, not a big deal, but in terms of usability, it's an extra, error-prone step that everyone must do before calling their service.
Any thoughts? It would be great to change it back to the way it worked in 2.5.1
