Forum Discussion
tongilcoto
12 years agoNew Contributor
I've just read this paragraph at the HTTP 1.1 RFC
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-14.23
A client MUST include a Host header field in all HTTP/1.1 request
messages . If the requested URI does not include an Internet host
name for the service being requested, then the Host header field MUST
be given with an empty value. An HTTP/1.1 proxy MUST ensure that any
request message it forwards does contain an appropriate Host header
field that identifies the service being requested by the proxy. All
Internet-based HTTP/1.1 servers MUST respond with a 400 (Bad Request)
status code to any HTTP/1.1 request message which lacks a Host header
field.
So i guess soap ui is just following http 1.1 rfc
Can anyone confirm it?
Thank you very much
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-14.23
A client MUST include a Host header field in all HTTP/1.1 request
messages . If the requested URI does not include an Internet host
name for the service being requested, then the Host header field MUST
be given with an empty value. An HTTP/1.1 proxy MUST ensure that any
request message it forwards does contain an appropriate Host header
field that identifies the service being requested by the proxy. All
Internet-based HTTP/1.1 servers MUST respond with a 400 (Bad Request)
status code to any HTTP/1.1 request message which lacks a Host header
field.
So i guess soap ui is just following http 1.1 rfc
Can anyone confirm it?
Thank you very much