Forum Discussion

aramhump's avatar
aramhump
14 years ago

Statistics not in report when executed from command line

Hi, I'm using LoadUI 1.5.0 and I have a very simple load test. When I execute from the GUI and view the summary report I see the statistics section including TPS and AVG time.
However, when I run from command line, these very important stats are absent from the generated PDF report (There is a section called "Statistics" but it's empty).

Also, I notice when I try to print the summary report from within the GUI - it also has an empty Statistics section.

The Statistics Workbench is great, however, I cannot get the 2 simple numbers i'm looking for (TPS & AVG)

The command im using is loadUI-cmd.bat -p "C:\engine-loadtests-sandbox.xml" -L 0:100:500 -r C:\loadui_reports -F PDF -l -s -S

Thanks,
Aram

2 Replies

  • SmartBear_Suppo's avatar
    SmartBear_Suppo
    Icon for Alumni rankAlumni
    14 years ago
    Thanks for reporting! I know that this has worked. Anyway, it's now in our backlog [LUCO-2420] and will probably be looked into soon.

    Regards

    Henrik
    SmartBear Software
  • EmilyS's avatar
    EmilyS
    Occasional Contributor
    14 years ago
    Hello - I have the same issue.

    I have a very simple load test that contains a statistics component. I have ticked its setting to "add last result to summary". When I execute and then view the summary report via the GUI, the summary report (yellow screen) contains the final set of statistics as expected.

    However, if I try to print the summary report via the GUI, the statistics section is empty (actually, it contains the word "Statistics").

    Also, when I execute from the command line, the statistics section is empty. This appears to be a problem for at least PDF, HTML, and TXT formats (I have not tried the other formats).

    I am using version 1.5.0, and the command I am using is:
    loadUI-cmd.bat -p <projectfilename> -r <reportdirectory> --format PDF --statistics

    Could you please advise as to when this might be fixed?

    Thanks,
    Emily