| SiKing wrote: |
|---|
| Is this for testing purposes, or are you suggesting this as a workaround? I have been running for a while with Groovy 2.1.1 (so I have a workaround), but do not mind upgrading that further (to help out with testing). |
A little bit of both. It's good to hear that people are running this without problems (and if you do encounter any issues, please let us know). We want to upgrade the groovy version in the future, but we also want to make sure to investigate the risk of breaking users' existing scripts before.
Regards,
Arian
SmartBear Sweden