Forum Discussion

ramaG's avatar
ramaG
Contributor
4 years ago

ReadyAPI -500 Error when using parameterized input values in the SOAP request using Data source step

ReadyAPI Test - 500 Error when using parameterized input values in the SOAP request using Data source step.

 

We have a Test case for SOAP service request. Added Data source step. We selected data source as Excel file.

I have parameterized few input values in the SOAP request using get data. When we run the request fails and throws 500 error.

The same works in REST test case.

 

Appreciate any help!

Thanks in advance

 

  • richie's avatar
    richie
    4 years ago
    Hey ramaG,

    You might have covered this off already, but did you compare the non paramterized SOAP call against the parameterized SOAP call (so compare the RAW request details) and anything in the logging?

    Ive got parameterized SOAP calls in a project at moment at its working fine. What version of ReadyAPI are you using?

    Cheers

    Rich
  • nmrao's avatar
    nmrao
    Champion Level 3
    4 years ago
    - Does the simple soap request works (test without datasource to isolate the issue)?
    - If that works, check the data and how it is parameterized
    - If that doesn't work, check with your (dev) team if it is internal service or the service provider with appropriate details for them to be able to reproduce the issue.
    • ramaG's avatar
      ramaG
      Contributor
      4 years ago

      Thanks for the reply.

      Yes, SOAP request works fine.

      We use Flight mock services to build different flavors of projects in ReadyAPI.

      Using Data source step with Excel data using parameterized values the REST request works fine.

      Seeing this issue only for SOAP request with Data source step with excel data parameterized using get data. 

      We checked the parameterized value syntax and did trouble shoot our end prior to posting here.

       

      Thank you!

      • nmrao's avatar
        nmrao
        Champion Level 3
        4 years ago
        Ok, strange.
        Possible to create a reproducible test?