alibaba82
17 years agoSuper Contributor
improvement idea about WSDL coverage
Hello,
I really the WSDL coverage feature. Based on my limited testing of this feature I think it could be further improved.
I have a method called 'Method A' which has various elements of various datatypes (string, int, etc).
If I have a single test case which has all the elements values filled in with some value, the WSDL coverage feature will show that the coverage is 100% (correct me if I am wrong here).
I think if I can specify a range of values in the interface for each element (maybe in the interface) and then calculate WSDL coverage based on those values, I will receive better coverage.
For example lets say I have a field called 'weekday'. I want to make sure that I test my 'Method A' with all values of 'weekday'. being able to interpret expressions will also be useful. so for integer types I can say '>7' and '<7' .
Thanks
Ali
I really the WSDL coverage feature. Based on my limited testing of this feature I think it could be further improved.
I have a method called 'Method A' which has various elements of various datatypes (string, int, etc).
If I have a single test case which has all the elements values filled in with some value, the WSDL coverage feature will show that the coverage is 100% (correct me if I am wrong here).
I think if I can specify a range of values in the interface for each element (maybe in the interface) and then calculate WSDL coverage based on those values, I will receive better coverage.
For example lets say I have a field called 'weekday'. I want to make sure that I test my 'Method A' with all values of 'weekday'. being able to interpret expressions will also be useful. so for integer types I can say '>7' and '<7' .
Thanks
Ali