11 years ago
Composite project: Problems with saving projects.
Hi,
I'm currently testing the functionality of coposite projects when working from 2 different workstations and I have 2 problems with it:
1. Saving issues due to overwritten files
Following scenario:
The result is that workstation 2 gets asked if the file for test case 1 should be overwritten, which in my eyes is wrong. If user 2 does confirm, the changes of workstation 1 are reverted.
Is this a known bug? Or is there something I can do to avoid this behaviour?
(I use SoapUI Pro 5.1.2.)
2. Overwriting message only with test case id
Everytime I get the message that a file has been modified externally, the message only states the Id of the changed item, which for the user is rather useless. an example:
Is this normal? Shouldn't there be something like the test case name?
best regards,
Michael
I'm currently testing the functionality of coposite projects when working from 2 different workstations and I have 2 problems with it:
1. Saving issues due to overwritten files
Following scenario:
- I have a project with 1 suite with 2 test cases.
- Workstation 1 adds a step to test case 1
- Workstation 2 adds a step to test case 2
- Workstation 1 saves.
--> OK: Only "element.order" and the file of test case 1 are changed and saved. - Workstation 2 saves.
--> NOT OK: For some reason SoapUI tries to save "element.order" and both test case files, even though this workstation has only changed test case 2.
The result is that workstation 2 gets asked if the file for test case 1 should be overwritten, which in my eyes is wrong. If user 2 does confirm, the changes of workstation 1 are reverted.
Is this a known bug? Or is there something I can do to avoid this behaviour?
(I use SoapUI Pro 5.1.2.)
2. Overwriting message only with test case id
Everytime I get the message that a file has been modified externally, the message only states the Id of the changed item, which for the user is rather useless. an example:
"File for [ea52fedb-a4e0-4a7b-ba85-bf0dc1888389] has been modified externally, overwrite?"
Is this normal? Shouldn't there be something like the test case name?
best regards,
Michael