Thank you!
Right after I posted this I found the sample script and it was very helpful. I was able to do what I needed to do.
But I must disagree about the documentation; not the availability but the quality. For instance, from the example you determine that you need to make a call to the mockRequest object. The API shows the methods of the object, but the API is extensive. Where is the documentation to find out how to use it to do something else that is not provided in a example script?
In this same context, I find the documentation for both the exporting of a mock REST service to a WAR file lacking as well as DETAILED information about how to run a test case using the mock REST service WAR in an automated command line environment. In my opinion, just stating that you can create a WAR file is not good documentation. Yes it's important to state this so one knows the feature is available, but good documentation would show how to do this and explain why one is doing what one does! For example it would be extremely helpful to have an explanation of what the WAR file will contain since it appears you have to export the whole project, but the only thing you really want tin the WAR file is the mock REST service. Is this or should it be a concern? If yes, why. If not, why.