nyczmagix
13 years agoOccasional Contributor
TestComplete Utility Functions vs. Scripting Language Functions
Does anyone know if there are any advantages/disadvantages in using TestComplete utility functions rather than the scripting language's built-in functions?
e.g.
to trim a string, I can use aqString.Trim() or the built-in VBScript's Trim().
to join 2 strings, I can use aqString.Concat() or just use the VBScript '&' operator
My thoughts - If TestComplete utility functions are merely wrappers over the scripting language's built-in functions, then isn't there extra overhead in using TestComplete's version of the common functions?
e.g.
to trim a string, I can use aqString.Trim() or the built-in VBScript's Trim().
to join 2 strings, I can use aqString.Concat() or just use the VBScript '&' operator
My thoughts - If TestComplete utility functions are merely wrappers over the scripting language's built-in functions, then isn't there extra overhead in using TestComplete's version of the common functions?