Forum Discussion
Hi Robert,
Yes, it's timing issues.
About environments, the physical machines I have a dedicated to tests. Thus I have a stable environment to ensure that the tests will run ok.
I wish I have enough desktop machines but I can't have a bunch of 5 of ones... So I wish I could set up one or 2 VM.
Still, generally speaking, depending upon how the VMs are configured (are they actually using a dedicated core of the host CPU and dedicated RAM as well? Or are they sharing resource with the other VMs? What about drive swapping, etc?) That's the trickiness of virtual environments, in my experience. I think, no matter what, they will almost ALWAYS run a bit slower than a dedicated desktop machine unless you have some really kick-a$$ hosting environment.
- m_essaid6 years agoValued Contributor
I'll try an intermediate solution : to put only one VM on each physical desktop.
- m_essaid6 years agoValued Contributor
As far as I understand you cannot allocate dedicated CPU cores to Hyper V. And very few hypervisors allow you to do so...
For the moment, just one HyperV per machine (so for each machine 2 TestExecute running at the same time) seems to be a good compromise.
- m_essaid6 years agoValued Contributor
Nobody else would like to share his experience with virtualization ?
Related Content
Recent Discussions
- 2 days agovladd1