Ask a Question

REST VirtResponse property expansion

ehsmaan
New Contributor

REST VirtResponse property expansion

Hi!

I wonder if it possible to use property expansion in REST VirtResponse response?

Regards,
Martin

3 REPLIES 3
richie
Community Hero

Re: REST VirtResponse property expansion

Hey @ehsmaan 

 

It's been a while since I was using ReadyAPI VIRTs, but VIRTs support custom properties.

 

Review this --> https://support.smartbear.com/readyapi/docs/virtualization/reference/rest-virt-properties.html

 

so according to this, it definitely supports properties so I wouldve thought expanding them wouldn't be a problem..... or am I misunderstanding something?

 

Cheers,

 

Rich

if this helped answer the post, could you please mark it as 'solved'? Also if you consider whether the title of your post is relevant? Perhaps if the post is solved, it might make sense to update the Subject header field of the post to something more descriptive? This will help people when searching for problems. Ta
ehsmaan
New Contributor

Re: REST VirtResponse property expansion

Hi!

I should have made it more clear that I am asking about the test step REST VirtResponse, not REST Virtual Service.

https://support.smartbear.com/readyapi/docs/functional/steps/rest-virt-response.html


Regards,
Martin

richie
Community Hero

Re: REST VirtResponse property expansion

Hey @ehsmaan,

I wont be much help on this. Ive seen this step type used once about 4 years ago so havent got the experience to comment.

However, the help link you specified does indicate you can create custom properties on the virt response step, so id go with my previous guess that it does in fact support property expansion.

Cheers,

Rich
if this helped answer the post, could you please mark it as 'solved'? Also if you consider whether the title of your post is relevant? Perhaps if the post is solved, it might make sense to update the Subject header field of the post to something more descriptive? This will help people when searching for problems. Ta
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: